I’ve long been riveted in the pursuit of understanding the nature of consciousness, epistemology, and the origins of the universe. Occasionally, I find an article from one of my online newsletter subscriptions… that simply blows my mind.

Here’s a brief synopsis of what I found today:

The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), launched in 2021 as a joint venture between NASA, the European Space Agency, and the Canadian Space Agency, has sent stunning images of celestial bodies. However, specific observations from the JWST challenge the standard model of cosmology:

Galaxy Formation: The JWST observed fully formed galaxies appearing earlier than expected according to the standard model. This observation defies the existing understanding of galaxy formation, which states that stars form first and then group together to form galaxies.

Hubble Constant Discrepancy: A significant issue in cosmological science is the inconsistency in calculating the rate at which the universe expands – the Hubble constant. While one method uses measurements from the early universe (like those JWST provides), the other calculates based on modern-day nearby stars. The two methods yield differing results, and recent data from the JWST only intensifies this discrepancy, pointing to a potential flaw in the standard model.

Issues with the Standard Model: Over the past 50 years, the standard model has been modified many times to align with new data. While these adjustments might be necessary, they sometimes seem conveniently tailored to fit the data. The model suggests that only 4% of the universe is “normal” matter, while the rest comprises dark matter and dark energy.

Cosmic Inflation & Multiverse Theory: The theory of cosmic inflation posits that the universe expanded exponentially fast for a fraction of a second post-Big Bang. This introduces the idea of a multiverse, meaning our universe might be just one among infinite unobservable universes.

The JWST’s revelations and other discrepancies in the standard model raise questions about the validity of prevailing theories. A new or drastically altered model is needed, which could lead to a rethinking of our understanding of fundamental cosmic elements and possibly even space and time itself.

This study blurs the lines between science and philosophy, and there’s a growing sense that foundational assumptions may need to be re-evaluated. For instance, some theories suggest the laws of physics evolve over time or that every act of observation influences the past and future of the universe.

The data from JWST suggests the need for a revolution, similar to when Copernicus introduced heliocentrism or when Einstein presented relativity. Such a revolution could profoundly reshape our understanding of the universe and our place within it.

So, hell yeah… there’s nothing I love more than when science questions its models. Although we may be long overdue for a revision of fundamental views, scientific revolutions are rare. According to some, we must wait for the old guard to die before new ideas gain credibility. That’s because so much is invested in the old, familiar, comfortable, time-tested models… check out your own life to verify this. However, given the uncertainty resulting from rapid global shifts, this might be the perfect time for an all-out shift in perception- just to remind us of the significance of life itself and how each of us can use the ‘ precious life’ we are given. 

Read the full article. It could be life altering.

Check it out here – and be sure to share your thoughts.  Love to hear from you.